This monitoring presents a compilation of reports from Tajikistan’s media and private reports from the NANSMIT monitoring network in the country
Coordinator of the Monitoring Network in Tajikistan:
Abdufattokh Vokhidov
Head of the Legal Service:
Orifjon Azimov
Head of the Project in Tajikistan:
Nuriddin Karshibayev
In May 2009 the NANSMIT Monitoring Service received 17 reports. Ten of them describe the factual situation in the media in the light of socio-legal and political environment; three reports describe direct violations of rights of media professionals; and four reports describe conflicts and accusations against the media and journalists.
I. PECULIARITIES OF POLITICAL, SOCIAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL CLIMATE IN THE COUNTRY DEFINING THE FACTUAL SITUATION IN THE MEDIA
1. Public speeches and statements of superior officials defining the factual situation in the mass media
6 May
All media, Dushanbe
On the eve of the International Freedom of Press Day the international non-governmental organization Freedom House published a traditional report Global Press Freedom 2009.
Tajikistan is rated 168-th among the 195 countries, where Freedom House assessed freedom and security of the media. Tajikistan shares this line with Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Sudan.
2. Journalists protecting their civil and professional rights
2 May
Bobojon Ikromov, freelance journalist, Khujand, Sughd province
Well-known Tajik journalist Bobojon Ikromov received an international award “Intellect of the Nation” for his merits in intellectual development of the society and high professional achievements. The conferment ceremony took place in Moscow, Russia, on 29 April, within the framework of the program Leaders of the XXI Century.
4 May
All media, Dushanbe
Dushanbe hosted a round table on the occasion of the International Free Pres Day. The event was organized by the National Association of Independent Media, Tajikistan (NANSMIT), the Tajik Union of Journalists, the Media Alliance of Tajikistan and the International Association of Persian-language Journalists “Afruz” under support of the OSCE Bureau in Tajikistan.
Human rights activists suggested to exclude the article from the Tajik Criminal Code establishing criminal responsibility for libel and defamation. Authoritative specialists on international law say that in many countries such accusations as libel and defamation of honor and dignity are considered in court in accordance with civil investigative demands.
Articles 135 and 136 of the Tajik Criminal Code limit the freedom of speech and expression. With this purpose in view, the Tajik media NGOs and professional unions set up a commission, which will prepare recommendations and proposals to the government and the parliament of Tajikistan.
8 May
IWPR, Dushanbe
The Tajik office of the British Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR) is going to expand the regional network of journalists from remote areas. With this purpose in view, IWPR held a two-day training course on international standards of journalism for media professionals in the rural regions of Tajikistan.
Lola Olimova, IWPR representative in Tajikistan says that the training was conducted within the framework of the IWPR project “Human rights and legal education through the media” financed by the European Commission. The Eurasia Foundation, which implements its own project “Tajik Regional Network of Correspondents”, was a co-organizer of the training.
13 May
Tajik media organizations
The Tajik Union of Journalists, the National Association of Independent Media, Tajikistan (NANSMIT), the Media Alliance of Tajikistan and the Tajik Memorial Fund of Journalists dessiminated a joint statement expressing concerns regarding purposeful criminal persecution of Ozodbek Khosabekov, the author of an open letter addressed to deputy prime minister Asadullo Gulomov. The letter was published in the Asia Plus weekly (#2, 10 January 2008). The author criticized the Civil Construction Department in Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous province for no-purpose spending of national funds.
The Tajik media organizations have approached the Supreme Court and the Prosecutor’s Office to protect Khosabekov’s constitutional right on freedom of expression and fair justice.
II. VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS AMONG JOURNALISTS AND THE MEDIA
1. Impeding access to the Internet
3 May
Babilon-Т, Internet provider, Dushanbe
Participants of the seminar “Access to Information in Tajikistan: legislation and practice” held in Khojaobigarm (70 kilometers to the North from the Tajik capital) on 1-3 May failed to open the web site of NANSMIT — www.nansmit.tj
Organizers of the seminar took good care of logistical provisions, including wireless access to the Internet. Consultants from the UK and Kazakhstan expressed a desire to familiarize themselves with the web resource of NANSMIT. They managed to open the web site only through the anonymizer software (it hides the opening IP address).
NANSMIT expressed its concerns to managers of the Babilon-T company. The conflict was resolved under mediation of Asomuddin Atoev, chairman of the Association of Internet Providers of Tajikistan. According to Asoev, Babilon-T did not have any bad intentions, and the problem was caused by technical reasons.
2. Violation of the principle of publicity of lawsuit
21 May
Vetcherny Dushanbe weekly, Dushanbe
Galina Dzutseva, correspondent of the Vetcherny Dushanbe weekly was refused access to courtroom for hearings on the case of Mr. Mirzoev, former director of the city zoo. The director was accused of neglect of official duties in relation to an accident in April 2006, when a little girl was maimed by a bear.
Four years have passed, but the litigation is not over. The proceedings were being held in an open court, but journalists were not allowed to attend it.
III. CONFLICTS. VIOLATIONS INCRIMINATED TO THE MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS
1. Accusation of embezzlement and document forgery
25 May
Pulod Umarov, former editor of the Tong newspaper, Khujand, Sughd province
The Khujand city court scheduled hearings on the case of Pulod Umarov, former editor of the Tong newspaper for 25 May. However, the hearings were postponed until a “special order” is issued by the authorities (according to the court secretary Mr. Rakhmatov).
Pulod Umarov and two other persons – accountant of the newspaper S. Umarova and entrepreneur D. Toshmatov are accused of embezzlement and document forgery, on Articles 257 and 340 of the Tajik Criminal Code.
2. Claims on protection of honor, dignity and business reputation following publication of certain data
7 May
Khoji Akbar Turajonzoda, parliamentarian, Dushanbe
On 9 April the newspaper Sobitiya (Events) published an article titled “Turajonzoda is a KGB agent”. Khoji Akbar Turajonzoda is a famous and, in some sense, a notorious figure in the Tajik political arena. In the early 1990-s he was holding a post of Kazi Kalon (superior spiritual leader of Tajik Muslims); at present he is a member of the Tajik parliament.
On 7 May Turajonzoda published his feedback on the article in the Ozodagon weekly. He says that he ahs been asking the editor of Sobitiya to publish his original confutation and to make public the name of the author of the previous article, since he wants to file a charge against him in court, but the editor declines his request inventing new reasons every time.
Additional relevant information is available at this link: http://www.asiaplus.tj/en/news/19/42500.html
14 May
Khoji Akbar Turajonzoda, parliamentarian, Dushanbe
Tajik Aluminum Company (Talco) released a statement over an article titled “Ravobiti Nek bo Russia ba Manfiyati Milli Most” (Good Relations with Russia Are for the Benefit of Our National Interests) by member of the Majlisi Milli (Tajikistan’s upper chamber of parliament) Hoji Akbar Turajonzoda that was published in the Dushanbe weekly, Farazh, on February 5.
In the statement, Tajik aluminum group expressed disagreement with position of Mr. Turajonzoda over the fate of the Tajik aluminum smelter.
Speaking in an interview with Farazh, Turajonzoda noted that proceedings from its national interests, Tajikistan ought to sell the aluminum plant the Russian Federation that would allow the national budget to receive additional considerable funds.
In the meantime, Talco notes that receipts to the republican budget from payments made by Talco are increasing. In 2005, Talco transferred 135 million somoni in taxes and other payments to the country’s budget, while in 2008, this figure reached 270 million somoni, according to the statement. In 2004, Talco paid 11 million US dollars for electricity supplies, while last year, the company’s electricity supply payments exceeded 100 million US dollars, the statement noted.
On the preferential terms created by the government for Talco, the statement noted that Russia’s aluminum company RusAl, for example, now paid 0.15-0.85 cent for 1 kWh of electricity, while Talco currently paid for electricity supplies at the rate of 1.5 cents per 1 kWh. “RusAl pays taxes at the rate of 45 US dollars per one ton of primary aluminum, while Talco pays taxes at the rate of 197 US dollars per one ton of aluminum,” the statement said.
This report is based on compiled materials from the media and private information presented by correspondents of the NANSMIT Monitoring Network
Coordinator of the Monitoring Service
Abdufattokh Vokhidov
Project Manager
Nuriddin Karshibayev