Freedom of Speech in Tajikistan January 2011

In January 2011 the NANSMIT Monitoring Service received 20 reports. Eleven of them describe the factual situation in the media in the light of socio-legal and political environment; seven reports describe direct violations of rights of media professionals; and two reports describe conflicts and accusations against the media and journalists.

I. POLITICAL, SOCIAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL CLIMATE IN THE COUNTRY DEFINING THE FACTUAL SITUATION IN THE MEDIA

1. Public speeches and statements of superior officials defining the factual situation in the mass media

January, 10
Kulyab city, Khatlon province

The Khatlon province authorities have opened an information-analytical unit in the administrative center, the city of Kulyab. The unit will coordinate activities of the media in ten districts of Khatlon province.

The unit will be headed by Temursho Faizaliev, correspondent of the Sadoi Mardum (Voice of People) weekly in Khatlon province. The creation of the media unit is based upon the necessity of covering big territories in the province.

According to NANSMIT monitoring service, the 10 districts of Khatlon with the population of 1 million have access to 10 newspapers (printing bodies of local administrations); two TV stations – one government and one private – broadcast in Khatlon.

13 January
Sukhrob Sharipov, Strategic Research Center under the President’s office

“The Party of Islamic Renaissance of Tajikistan (PIRT) is hardly more popular than the Communist Party of Tajikistan. However, our journalists give preference to PIRT thus ignoring the opinions of the other seven political parties”, — said Sukhrob Sharipov, director of the Strategic Research Center under the Office of the President.

The director of the state think tank considers that the government and the media pay way too much attention to PIRT. “Parliamentary elections last year showed the real popularity of PIRT – only two representatives got their seats in the parliament”.

Sharipov states that Tajikistan should not follow the suit of Islamic countries. “The Islamic states nowadays are the most undeveloped. We have chosen the democratic way and must go along this way. We can keep on going only if we stick to the democratic, secular and legal orientation”, — he said.

13 January
Usmon Solekhov, head of the PDPT public relations unit, Dushanbe

“The People’s Democratic Party of Tajikistan (PDPT) has no problems in relations with the media”, — said Usmon Solekhov, head of the PDPT public relations unit. The statement was made in response to the speech of Sukhrob Sharipov, director of the government think tank who criticized the Tajik media for paying excessive attention to the Islamic Renaissance Party and ignoring the other political forces in the country.

Solekhov said that PDPT has its own printing body – the Minbari Khalk weekly; and the party remains open for all media, including private ones.

“In certain cases, private newspapers refuse to publish articles and interviews prepared by our party, but this is their absolute right”, — he added.

Solekhov considers that certain political parties are passive in their relations with the media, and this is their own fault; journalists have nothing to do with that.

14 January
Asadullo Rakhmonov, Broadcasting Committee under the government, Dushanbe

According to Asadullo Rakhmonov, head of the Tajik State TV and Radio Committee under the government, ten applicants were denied TV broadcasting license in 2010.

According to Rakhmonov, the reason for denial is the “lack of registration documents”, i.e. the applicants failed to present the whole package of required papers. The official added that “most of those who want to create a TV company do not have sources of financing and proper documents confirming compliance of their equipment to existing technical standards”.

14 January
Asadullo Rakhmonov, Broadcasting Committee under the government, Dushanbe

Afghanistan, Iran and Tajikistan cannot settle the issue of joint TV broadcasting. According to the REGNUM news agency, Iran has failed to deliver the promised broadcasting equipment.

Asadullo Rakhmonov, chairman of the Tajik broadcasting body under the government told the media that the broadcasting studio in Dushanbe is ready, but the Iranian counterparts delay the delivery of equipment, and Afghanistan ignores meetings to discuss the issue.

Prior to that, the Iranian ambassador in Dushanbe told journalists that the constant putting-off of the launching of the joint TV channel is caused by the position of the Afghan colleagues. Although the ambassador did not get into details, experts say that the Afghan counterparts are not disgruntled over the name of the new broadcasting enterprise – “Persian-language TV Channel” – saying that most of Afghanistani are Pashtu for whom the Persian language is not their mother tongue.

Experts also say that the parties cannot agree on the broadcasting schedule, contents of TV programs and the appearance of TV anchors. Iran and Afghanistan are Islamic states, and Tajikistan is a secular one.

The decision on creation of a joint Persian-language TV channel was reached in July 2006 in Tehran between the presidents of Tajikistan and Iran. In March 2008, at a tripartite meeting in Dushanbe, Afghanistan joined the initiative. It was also agreed that the broadcasting studio will be located in the Tajik capital.

2. Factual situation in the media and the freedom of speech

14 January
Freedom House, USA

The international human rights watchdog Freedom House published its annual report where Tajikistan is rated in the category of “non-free” countries.

In 2011, Freedom House defined the freedom index in 194 countries and 14 territorial units. The rate scale is from 1 to 7. There are three dimensions of freedom for the countries: free, partially free and non-free. The free countries are given the index 1.

Tajikistan gained 6 points in the rating of political rights, i.e. it belongs to the category of countries with no political freedoms. In the rating of freedom of society Tajikistan gained 5 points.

Freedom House indicates the overall deterioration for five years in a row, hitting the all time high in the 40 years of the ratings’ history.

The most undemocratic are North Korea, Turkmenistan, Libya, Uzbekistan, Sudan and Iran.

Among the former Soviet countries, the Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia and Kyrgyz Republic are named “partially free states”. The “free states” are Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Russia, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan have belonged to the category of “non-free countries”.

Freedom House has been involved in annual ratings of civil and political freedoms since 1972.

January 27
Bozor Sobir, Tajik poet, Dushanbe

“The Tajik mass media are not free; it cannot bring any benefit to the people”, — said Bozor Sobir, a popular Tajik poet. (Interview with the Millat weekly, #04, 26.02.2011).

“The Tajik press outlets publish everything – all kinds of jokes and gibberish… The “existing” freedom of expression is only for the benefit of spiritual leaders and mosques”.

Bozor Sobir noted that there is a necessity to introduce censorship in printing media and book publishing. “Dushanbe is overstaffed with useless books; even the authors don’t read them. Those books cannot do any good to the people. Unless measures are taken, this mess will keep going…”

3. Journalists protecting their civil and professional rights

January, 04
The Committee of 29 September, Dushanbe

The Coalition of the Tajik media organizations recently formed for protection of professional rights and journalists – The Committee of 29 September – has declared its voluntary dissolution in connection with main tasks.

In October 2010, a group of media managers, representatives of media and public organizations and particular activists created a media coalition, which was named “The Committee of 29 September”. This name is related to the date of the beginning of the unprecedented pressing of the Tajik independent mass media.

On 29 September 2010, the authorities blocked access to two local and three foreign web sites (Avesta.Tj; Tojnews.Tj and Tjknews.com; Ferghana.Ru; Centrasia.Ru accordingly). A few days later, the Tax Committee officials accompanied by the state TV crews held inspections of all private printing houses countrywide, after which the latter refused to provide their services to three private newspapers – Farazh, Nigokh, and Paykon. These actions were also accompanied by statements of the Minister of Defense accusing the private media of provocations and “jetting a crisis” upon the background of a complicated military-political situation. There was another particular statement about censoring of the contents of all periodicals prior to printing.

Members of the Committee promised to coordinate their activities and undertake all possible legal actions in order to return the situation to the previous state and terminate censorship.

It should be noted that the main participants of the Committee – representatives of the four blocked online sources and one association, NANSMIT – have undertaken joint actions to accomplish the tasks. These actions have resulted in the following:

— a statement addressed to the head of the state and his direct subordinates;
— a statement addressed to the international human rights bodies and foreign governments;
— a wide-scale public information campaign focused on the problems in the area of the freedom of speech (development of a web blog; social network pages; launching of banners; a series of interviews in foreign online media and TV);
— preparation of claims and legal actions against the government bodies exercising and supporting pressure against the independent media;
— negotiations with parties involved.

These actions have caused an international resonance and essential feedback in the Tajik government and non-governmental organizations. Gradually, the web sites were unblocked; the newspapers Nigokh and Farazh resumed their publications.

By 1 January 2011, the Committee fully accomplished its tasks. The attempts to limit the media freedom are neutralized by the Committee; the local media work in normal mode. Thus, the Committee decided to declare its voluntary dissolution.
Along with that, the media and other organizations, the former members of the coalition henceforth, jointly and individually, will keep protecting the indispensable rights of citizens on access to information. The web site of the coalition – http://tjk29.livejpurnal.com and the e-mail address – komitet29@gmail.com will be valid for further activities and consolidation of the media community to keep informing the public about the problems and the progress of the parties, former members of the coalition, as well as about the monitoring of rights in the media.
The created coalition, its success and victories have proven that the media community is a serious public force able to influence the processes of democratic development and civil rights.

January, 20
The Tajik Media Alliance, Dushanbe

The Tajik Media Alliance called on the resigned staff of the Vetecherny Dushanbe weekly and the owner of the newspaper to hold negotiations and find consensus in the conflict.

“The conflict may result in idleness of our colleagues who must keep covering the ongoing events in the country and perform their professional duties”, — said Khurshed Niyozov, the secretary of the Media Alliance.

On 19 January, the whole staff of Vetcherny Dushanbe made a statement of resignation in view of “rude violations by the owner of the newspaper against the personnel”.

In his turn, Akbarali Sattorov, director general of the Charkhi Gardun Ltd, which the newspaper belongs to stated that the journalists’ actions is sabotage.

The Media Alliance is ready to play the role of a mediator and peacemaker in this conflict. Niyozov added that this incident may have a negative impact on the recent successes and achievements of the Tajik mass media.

January, 28
All media, Kurgan-Tube

Independent journalists in the city of Kurgan-Tube organized a press club. This public organization will hold monthly meetings to discuss the issues of professional development, legal support and analyze publications in the local media.

II. VIOLATION OF RIGHTS IN THE MEDIA

1. Accusation of libel and insult

January, 6
Makhmadyusuf Ismoilov, correspondent, Nuri Zindagi weekly, Khujand, Sughd province

The International human rights watchdog Reporters Without Borders calls for the release of Makhmadyusuf Ismoilov, a newspaper reporter who has been detained arbitrarily by prosecutors in Khujand, in the northern province of Sughd, since 23 November.

Ismoilov was arrested at the behest of the regional prosecutor’s office one day after an article he wrote about its alleged corrupt and irregular practices was published in the newspaper Istikol. His detention is clearly designed to stop him working as regional correspondent.

He has often criticized the local authorities during the three years that he has worked as a Khujand-based reporter for various newspapers including the national weekly Nuri Zindagi. It is regrettable that the only response from the local authorities to his criticism it to arrest him. It is doubtful that regional prosecutor Anvar Kanoat’s investigation is impartial.

Ismoilov is charged under various articles of the criminal code with libel, insulting an official, inciting religious and racial hatred and blackmail. Nuriddin Karshiboyev, the head of the National Association of Independent Media of Tajikistan (NANSMIT), says he is being prosecuted solely because of what he wrote.

The trial is due to take place at the end of January and the Sughd regional court has ordered that Ismoilov be detained throughout the pre-trial investigation. Nuri Zindagi editor Djumo Mirzo has received a letter from the prosecutor requesting copies of all the articles that Ismoilov has written for the newspaper.

Reporters Without Borders calls for Ismoilov’s release pending the start of the trial. It also supports NANSMIT’s call for a fair trial and respect for the right to an independent defence.

The situation of the media and access to information has still not returned to normal after the crackdown carried out by the Tajik authorities in September (http://en.rsf.org/tadjikistan-after-using-civil-war-spectre-to-15-10-2010,38552.html). Several news websites are still experiencing hosting problems and some newspapers, including Faraj and Paikhon, are still being harassed and having problems finding a printer.

2. Impediments to professional activities

January, 21
Khosiyat Komilova, K Plus TV, Khujand, Sughd province

On 21 January 2011, the law enforcement agencies managed to prevent a terrorist attack in Khujand. Two suspiciously looking vehicles stuffed with hand-made bombs were parked near the premises of the Interior Department.

Khosiyat Komilova and Ekhson Ibragimov, two journalists from the local TV company K Plus made some shooting for a news program; however, upon their return to the TV station, they were visited by two law enforcement officers who invited the journalists for clarification of “certain details” related to the evacuation of local residents.

“When we left the office, we saw a police car and six armed policemen. We were placed in the vehicle and delivered to the Khujand city Interior Department”, — told Komilova.

The journalists were reproached for filming of “secret objects”. The policemen said the journalists had no right for shooting and sent their technician to the TV station to destroy the filmed meterials.

Komilova complains that the law enforcement bodies in Sughd province are reluctant to cooperate with the media. “We have to go through a number of offices to get permission for information”, — she said.

The incident with the K Plus is not the first of this kind. In September 2010, the Sughd province law enforcement servicemen detained journalists working for the local and international media and confiscated their equipment. A journalist from the Asia TV & Radio company was beaten by the police; they threw his photo camera in the river.

January, 27
Abdunasim Rajab, freelance photo journalist, Dushanbe

On 27 January, during a training photo session, the police detained Abdunasim Rajab, a student of the Tajik National University.

Rajab complains that the policemen treated him like a criminal.

The student was performing a task filming in the streets of Dushanbe. After the detention by the traffic police, he was delivered to the Shohmansur district police station where he was charged with filming police officers. The student was forced to give his fingerprints; all pictures in the camera were deleted.

3. Ungrounded limitation of access to information

January, 13
All media, Dushanbe

Tajik journalists are not satisfied with the quality of quarterly press conferences conducted by government institutions. (Farazh weekly, #2, 12.01.2011).

Zarina Khushvakht, correspondent of the BBC Persian service says that it is nice to attend quarterly press conferences, where one can get answers to questions; on the other hand, when an urgent response is needed, bureaucrats send the journalist to the forthcoming press conference, saying that “right now, they cannot share any information”.

“All press conferences are conducted in accordance with established standard – officials spend 30-40 minutes telling the audience about their work”, — says Nazarali Pirnazarov, correspondent of CA-News. — “Some officials go beyond the limits of decency saying rude things; others restrain from comments as if they do not have their own opinion”.

Abduazim Abduvakhobov, correspondent of Imruz News says that a lot depends on the journalists’ talents and skills.

4. Impediments in dissemination of printing products

January 27
All media, Dushanbe)

The Asia Plus weekly published complaints from street vendors selling newspapers. (#07, 26.02.2011).

Street vendors say that the police push them away from public places where they usually sell newspapers saying that it is allowed to sell media products only in the newsstands (kiosks).

The mayor’s office press secretary Shavkat Saidov told the media that the police are acting on the basis of the city administration’s errand.

The mayor’s office instruction is quite controversial. On the one hand, selling of printing products in “inappropriate places” is prohibited; on the other hand, the officials say that nobody banned street vendors from selling newspapers.

III. CONFLICTS. VIOLATIONS INCRIMINATED TO MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS

1. Protection of honor, dignity and business reputation

January, 24
First TV Channel, Dushanbe

The mayor’s office in Dushanbe accused the journalists of the First State TV Channel of lack of professionalism and preconception.

According to Shavkat Saidov, the city administration’s press secretary, the complaint is caused by a series of TV stories about preparation of municipal communal services to the winter season.

January, 27
Asia Plus weekly, Dushanbe

The Union of Journalists of Tajikistan (UJT) and the Tajik National Association of Mass Media (NANSMIT) express their concern in relation to persecution of journalists who use their right to expression, which contradicts the standards of the national and international law.

On 26 January 2011, the Asia Plus weekly published a legal notice of claim by the head of the Organized Crime Control Unit of the Tajik Interior Ministry Anvar Tagoimurodov, who states that the newspaper has disseminated slanderous information thus affecting the reputation of the law enforcement agency. The official demands a compensation from Asia Plus in the amount of 1 million Somoni (about $225 thousand).
The reason for the claim was an article y Ramziya irzobekova “Investigation or inquisition?” published in Asia Plus on 21.12.2010. The article contained information about tortures against persons on remand in the law enforcement units of Sughd province.

Tagoimurodov states that “correspondents write their stories based on quotes of people who are biased, and these stories are slandering and insulting”. He also alleged in his statement that Mirzobekova and other journalists who were covering the terrorist attack in Khujand (in September 2010) “personally knew those who committed the attack; and they were aware of the criminals’ evil intentions, and, probably, had relations with them”.
He editor of Asia Plus Marat Mamadshoev called this statement of the law enforcement official accusing journalists of helping terrorists “outrageous”. Ramziya Mirzobekova has been repeatedly invited to the Prosecutor General’s office – allegedly for clarification of facts in her article; however, the officials are not really interested in lerning about the sources of information. The correspondent is incriminated in committing grave crimes; but she is not allowed to apply to a lawyer. This is a violation of the legislation; namely, the clauses prohibiting the disclosure of names and sources of information.
According to Article 19 of the International Pact on Human and Political Rights, which Tajikistan signed in 1999, citizens are guaranteed their right to freedom of expression, including the right to seek for and disseminate any information or ideas, regardless of the state boundaries – verbally or in written form, by means of printing or in artistic forms.

According to Article 30 of Tajikistan’s Constitution, citizens are guaranteed the freedom of speech, printing and the use of mass media; the state censorship and persecutions are prohibited.

The growing number of persecutions of journalists in Tajikistan and the court cases prove that the final goal of the complainants is not to “rectify mistakes”, but to shut down journalists. The pressure upon Tajikistan’s independent media might lead to serious restrictions of the freedom of speech in self-censorship, which has a negative impact on the image of Tajikistan in the international arena.
UJT and NANSMIT call the Prosecutor General’s office and other law enforcement bodies on investigating this case in order to stop any violations of constitutional rights in the country, in particular, the right to expression and access to information.

This report is based on compiled materials from the media and private information presented by correspondents of the NANSMIT Monitoring Network

Coordinator of the Monitoring Service
Abdufattokh Vokhidov

Project Manager
Nuriddin Karshibaev

Global call for MEPs to protect transparency of the European Union

28 January 2011, Brussels/London/Madrid: 131 non-governmental organisations along with 56 investigative journalists, academics, and access to information campaigners from 48 countries in Europe and beyond are calling on Members of the European Parliament to act urgently to protect EU transparency rules.1 The call comes as the European Union engages in a review of its access to documents regulation that could result in freedom of information being severely curtailed across Europe.

Proposals put forward by the European Commission would substantially reduce the number of public documents by denying access to e-mails and other documents sent within the EU that are not “formally” transmitted, and by allowing individual Member States greater powers to keep their communications with the EU secret.2 The proposals, which have been criticised by the EU Ombudsman,3ignore the principle of openness enshrined in the founding treaties of European Union and would roll back rulings by the European Court of Justice which support a wider right of access to documents.

The campaign, coordinated by environmental lawyers ClientEarth, human rights organisation Access Info Europe, and Greenpeace, is urging MEPs in the LIBE Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to vote against the Commission’s proposals. A debate on the issue will take place in Parliament on Tuesday 1 February 2011. Leading human rights and journalists’ organisations including Transparency International, Global Witness, Article 19, Statewatch and the World Press Freedom Committee have already signed the letter to MEPs. It will remain open to signatories until the vote.

James Thornton, CEO of ClientEarth, comments:
“Access to information is fundamental to democracy.If these proposals are allowed to become law opaque decision-making will be legitimatised. Governments and private companies will be able to exert increasing influence, confident that the European Union will keep their lobbying secret.”

Helen Darbishire, Executive Director of Access Info Europe, comments:
“Everyone in Europe has the right to know what their elected representatives are doing with the power entrusted to them and how the public’s money is being spent. 0ur representatives should be fighting to extend the rights of citizens, not reduce them. They should be calling for a stronger protection of a right of access to EU information, and should reject out of hand this attempt to limit the existing access to documents rules.”

Daniel Simons, Legal Counsel Campaigns and Actions at Greenpeace International, comments:
“The European Union is already not a role model on transparency, with many requests for documents processed late or rejected on questionable grounds, and these proposals will make matters worse. EU citizens and the rest of the world expect the EU to set a high standard, as the wide support for this letter from inside and beyond the EU shows.”

Access Info Europe and ClientEarth have also both been forced to file separate lawsuits against the Council of the European Union for access to documents concerning the proposed reforms. Access Info Europe’s case concerns access to a document which would show the positions taken by member states during negotiations.4 ClientEarth’s lawsuit concerns access to a legal document that gives information about the decision making process behind this review.5

Notes to Editor
1. Open Letter: MEPs called upon to protect EU transparency:
http://www.access-info.org/documents/Access_Docs/Advancing/EU/Letter_MEPs_28_Jan_2011.pdf
2. ClientEarth Briefing: Recast of Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to European institutions’ documents. http://www.clientearth.org/briefing-recast-of-regulation-10492001-regarding-public-access-to-european-parliamentcouncil-and-commissions-documents
3. Ombudsman Press Release: “Ombudsman warns that citizens’ right of access to documents is at risk”, 02 June 2008. http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/press/release.faces/en/241/html.bookmark
4. Access Info v Council (case T-233/09, see http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:205:0040:0041:EN:PDF and http://www.access-info.org/en/european-union). A hearing before the General Court was held in October 2010 and a judgement is expected in the Spring of 2011.
5. ClientEarth vs Council transparency lawsuit: http://www.clientearth.org/clientearth-vs-council-transparency-lawsuit
For further information contact:

Katherine Sladden | Communications officer | t. +44 (0)203 0305954 or m. +44(0)7538418460 | ksladden@clientearth.org

Helen Darbishire | Executive Director, Access Info | m. + 34 667 685 319 | helen@access-info.org

Access Info Europe
Access Info Europe is a human rights organisation dedicated to promoting and protecting the right of access to information in Europe and globally as a tool for defending civil liberties and human rights, for facilitating public participation in decision-making, and for holding governments accountable. www.access-info.org

ClientEarth
ClientEarth is an environmental law organisation working in the public interest. Based in Europe and operating globally, we address issues including deforestation, energy efficiency, biodiversity protection, and the transparency and enforcement of environmental law. www.clientearth.org

www.clientearth.org

Small grants program announced in Tajikistan

Deadline:07/02/11
Internews Network in Tajikistan /USAID
LocationTajikistan

Journalism and nonprofit organizations in Tajikistan can apply to a small grants program that aims to improve journalists’ access to information about media law.

Grants are given to organize trainings, seminars, public hearings and other events in the field of media law.

For more information (in Russian), click here: http://ijnet.org/opportunities/small-grants-program-announced-tajikistan

http://ijnet.org/opportunities/small-grants-program-announced-tajikistan

Radio Vatan has restarted broadcasting in Khatlon

Dear partners,

We would like to share with you good news. Radio Vatan has restarted broadcasting in the Khatlon region of Tajikistan.

Radio Vatan is the only independent radio station that is currently broadcasting in Khatlon.

We also continue the project, together with our partners and donors related to the social and economical situation in Khatlon.

For cooperation and advertising issues that include PR-programs, social and information programs and media campaigns in Dushanbe and the Khatlon region please contact the General Director of Radio Vatan Ms. Vera Kulakova-Brannerud at email verafromvatan@mail.ru or office telephone +992 (37) 2231106

More information about us: /www.vatan.tj/

— Radio Vatan is a News and Entertainment station based in Dushanbe and Khatlon.

— Radio Vatan is the official Tajikistan partner of Deutsche Welle and Deutsche Welle Academy and the official partner to Voice of Russia.

— Radio Vatan is a member of Journalist Association «Media-Alliance», and member of International Association of radio broadcasting Companies.

— Vatan is the only radio station in Tajikistan to broadcast news every day from 8am to 6pm on the half-hour alternating between Russian and Tajik languages. In addition, its informational programming includes a weekly news analysis talk show.

— Radio Vatan is an organizer of concert events in Tajikistan such pop stars as Andy (USA), Ingrid (Italy), Katya Lel (Russia), Yulduz Usmanova, Sevinc, Firouz Dzhumaniezova (Uzbekistan).

Yours sincerely,

Vera Kulakova-Brannerud,
General Director
Radio Vatan

www.vatan.tj

Religion reporting competition accepting entries

Deadline:01/02/11
Religion Newswriters Association

Journalists who cover religion can compete for 19 awards in six media categories: newspapers, magazines, broadcast outlets, multimedia outlets, books and student publications. There is US$10,000 available in prize money.

For more information, click here: http://www.rna.org/news/55828/Call-for-entries-2011-Religion-Newswriters-Ass

http://www.rna.org/news/55828/Call-for-entries-2011-Religion-Newswriters-Ass

Funding available to women media entrepreneurs

Deadline:04/04/11
McCormick Foundation

Funding is available for four women with original ideas for websites, mobile news services or other initiatives. The one-time prizes are US$12,000.

Projects must launch within 10 months, have journalistic value and have a plan for continuing after initial funding has ended. For more information, click here: http://www.newmediawomen.org/site/proposal_guidelines/

http://www.newmediawomen.org/site/proposal_guidelines/

Entire Staff At Dushanbe’s Russian-Language Weekly Resigns

DUSHANBE — The entire staff of the Russian-language weekly «Vecherny Dushanbe» has resigned to protest censorship and «harassment» by their owner, RFE/RL’s Tajik Service reports.

Journalists at the newspaper issued a statement on January 18 announcing their resignations.

They also accused Akbar Sattor, head of the Charkhi Gardun Media Group that owns the paper, of censorship, harassment, and ignoring the country’s labor law.

Gulnora Amirshoeva told RFE/RL today that the paper’s staff had been under nonstop pressure for the past six months. She said Sattor repeatedly threatened to close the weekly because it is not profitable.

Amirshoeva said journalists at «Vecherny Dushanbe» asked Sattor to let them take over the paper, but he demanded a huge sum of money to do so.

Sattor rejected Amirshoeva’s charges. He told RFE/RL it was true that «Vecherny Dushanbe» is unprofitable, but denied he wanted to close it.

Sattor said he planned to launch another weekly in Tajik that would have the same content as «Vecherny Dushanbe» because there is an increasingly smaller demand in Tajikistan for Russian-language newspapers.

Sattor said that despite the journalists’ resignation he would try to publish the weekly as usual.

Media experts note that Sattor’s situation is delicate because he is also the head of Tajikistan’s Union of Journalists, and in that capacity is obliged to defend journalists’ rights.

Tajik lawyer Hamza Hakimzoda said that according to the law, in cases where a conflict of interest arises the official involved should put his/her union leadership ahead of commercial interests.

«Vecherny Dushanbe» was founded in 1968 as the daily newspaper of the Dushanbe Committee of Tajikistan’s Communist Party. It became independent in 1992 and, in 1996, Sattor’s media group acquired it and turned it into a weekly.

http://www.rferl.org/content/russian_tajik_weekly_staff_resigns/2281388.html

Persian-speaking countries still cannot start joint broadcasting

Afghanistan, Iran and Tajikistan still cannot settle the issues of joint broadcasting. According to the REGNUM news agency, Iran fails to supply the TV broadcasting equipment.
According to Asadullo Rakhmonov, chairman of the Tajik State Broadcasting Committee the premises in Dushanbe are ready; what is needed for the time being is the equipment. The official also said that representatives of Iran and Tajikistan have recently had a meeting in the Tajik capital where they intended to discuss the terms of broadcasting, but their Afghan counterparts ignored the consultation.

Earlier, the ambassador of Iran to Tajikistan Ali Asgari Sherdust told the media that the cause of constant postponing of launching of the Persian-language TV channel is the Afghan uncertain position. The Kabul authorities consider that most of the population in Afghanistan are Pashtu people who do not speak Persian.

Apart from that, the parties cannot agree upon the content of TV programs and the appearance of TV anchors. Iran and Afghanistan are Islamic states, whereas Tajikistan is a secular country. Iranian and Afghan TV channels prohibit appearance of women without hijab.

The decision about the creation of the Persian-language TV channel was reached between the Tajik and Iranian presidents in July 2006 in Tehran. In March 2008, in Dushanbe, during a tripartite meeting of foreign ministers the parties agreed to create a Persian-language TV channel. It was decided that the headquarters of the new TV company will be located in Dushanbe.

REGNUM

RFE Journalists in Trouble 2010: Wrap Up

During 2010, RFE journalists suffered intimidation, physical attacks and arbitrary arrest in 12 of the 21 countries forming its broadcast region. The year presented additional challenges as authorities in Belarus, Turkmenistan and Iran broadened their efforts beyond individuals and conducted sustained campaigns to silence entire RFE language services. RFE’s experience is consistent wih the findings of other media watchdogs, suggesting that governments in its broadcast region are increasingly intolerant of independent media and that the tools traditionally available to safeguard it are increasingly inadequate.

The December sentencing of Ernest Vardanean, a contributor to RFE’s Moldovan service, epitomized the vulnerability of RFE journalists everywhere to lawless regimes. Vardanean, who was first detained in April and ultimately tried behind closed doors, received a 15-year prison sentence from a court in Moldova’s breakawayTransdniester region on charges of state treason.

Such risks were on display in mass proportions in Belarus as RFE journalists were beaten and detained in mass arrests that imprisoned hundreds following the December 19 presidential elections. Ten days later, RFE’s Minsk bureau was anticipating a raid on its premises as part of a crackdown on the independent media. The bureau was the target of a sustained campaign of official intimidation earlier in the year. Two freelancers resigned after receiving threats from security agents against family members. Authorities also used accreditation to intimidate RFE journalists, stripping one correspondent of her status and forcing another to quit. In September, authorities issued a warning that all employees risked losing accreditation, a threat, in effect, to shut the bureau down. The bureau chief was interrogated by the KGB in the summer and harassed during routine border crossings to neighboring states.

Intimidation of members of RFE’s Turkmen service began mid-year and continued unchecked at year’s end. In numerous instances relatives of the service’s Prague-based staff were interrogated, threatened, dismissed from long-held jobs, denied travel rights and in other ways blacklisted as a result of their association with RFE. A Prague-based correspondent was refused entry to the country and banned as an “inadmissible subject” in May after attempting a visit following 11 years of exile. During the year, RFE’s website and phone lines to its correspondents in the country were routinely monitored and blocked.

In Kyrgyzstan, several RFE correspondents were victims of interethnic violence that erupted in the country’s southern regions in June. Two correspondents for our Uzbek service fled their homes in Osh after attackers targeted them for their ethnicity and their reporting on atrocities.
RFE journalists covering events in Tajikistan’s remote northern provinces were vilified and threatened in a series of articles that were published in local newspapers and which appeared to be part of a coordinated campaign.

In the North Caucasus, where independent journalism is nearly extinct, two correspondents resigned from RFE’s small Chechen service this year after security agents threatened their families.

Efforts to thwart Radio Farda, RFE’s Persian language service, continued this year, and included routine blocking of its website and the publication of a 360-page book by Iran’s Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance deploring the radio’s purpose, programs and employees. Farda staff members in Prague received threats, as did their family members in Iran.

At year’s end, the Azerbaijani service marked the second year since the government banned its broadcasts from medium wave and FM.

RFE’s Russian service continued to suffer the loss of broadcast affiliates across the Federation from almost 30 in 2004 to fewer than three in 2010 as a result of political pressure. RFE journalists in Russia operate in the shadow of some 20 journalists who have been killed and countless others who were brutally attacked this decade and whose cases remain unsolved.

http://www.rferl.org/content/journalists_in_trouble_the_record_2010/2271786.html

Ten applicants were denied licenses in Tajikistan in 2010

Asadullo Rakhmonov, chairman of the Tajik State Broadcasting Committee told the media that ten applicants were denied TV broadcasting licenses in Tajikistan in 2010.

The official said that the reason for denial is “incompletion” of licensing documents. Besides that, most of the applicants do not have sources of funding and proper documents proving compliance of their equipment to modern standards of broadcasting.

Rakhmonov explained that issuance of licenses does not depend solely on the Broadcasting Committee. “The licensing commission comprises of representatives of six ministries and government agencies”, — he added.

www.asiaplus.tj