In January 2012, the Monitoring Service received 23 reports. Ten of them describe the factual situation in the media in the light of social, legal and political environment, and thirteen reports describe direct violations of rights of media professionals.
I. POLITICAL, SOCIAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL CLIMATE IN THE COUNTRY DEFINING THE FACTUAL SITUATION IN THE MEDIA
1. Public speeches and statements of superior officials defining the factual situation in the mass media
19 January
Emomali Rakhmon, President of Tajikistan, Dushanbe
The President of Tajikistan Emomali Rakhmon criticized the quality of state TV stations’ programs. He made rather sharp remarks at a government meeting convened on 19 January to discuss the issues of economic and social development in the country in 2012 and the tasks for 2012.
Rakhmon noted that instead of praising public officials, the state TV companies should pay more attention to existing problems in the country. He also advised the TV managers to restrain from self-advertisement. “No matter who you are – poets, writers, whatsoever… you serve your people; let others advertise you. It’s a shame to see how you promote yourselves! And it is shameful to see fulsome flattery and adulation”.
2. Actions of public officials defining the situation in the media
24 January
Head of administration, Khatlon province
Akbar Muslimov, editor of the Guliston newspaper in the city of Kurgan-Tube is acknowledged the best specialist in the media area in 2011. The province administration held a special competition to define best specialists of the year.
Chairman of Khatlon province Gaibullo Avzalov encouraged local journalists to work harder and not to be shy revealing and exposing the existing economic and social problems.
3. Journalists protecting their civil and professional rights
7 January
Journalists’ Club, Sughd province
On 7 January 2012, journalist of Sughd province discussed legal and ethical aspects of their professional activities. The meeting was organized by the Tajik National Association of Independent Mass Media.
Participants discussed particular cases of violation of legal and ethical standards. Nuriddin Karshibaev, chairman of NANSMIT said that it is necessary to make a clear distinction between the editorial policy and advertisement/commercial activities in the media – so that sponsored and PR articles would not have a negative impact on the image of journalists and their media.
Participants stressed the necessity of strengthening the legal and professional status of journalists, and the need to enhance relations with other sectors of the society.
The Club of Journalists in Sughd province is an independent social group guided by the principles of corporative solidarity. The Club is open for any printing or electronic medium as well as for any individual media professional.
4. Changes and amendments affecting the media legislation
4 January
Ozodagon weekly, Dushanbe
The Ozodagon weekly (#1, 4 January 2012) reported that the Ministry of Culture, following a request by the Tax Committee, sent letters to all newspapers asking them to reregister.
Legal and media experts say that the request of the Tax Committee is poorly motivated; some of them see this government move as an attempt to create artificial difficulties for the opposition media.
5. Factual situation in the media and the freedom of expression
11 January
Oriyono Media, Dushanbe
The Farazh weekly (#2, 11 January 2012) published an interview with the director of the Oriyono media holding and the founder of the Imruz News weekly Rustam Joni.
Despite all rumors, Rustam Joni says that te Imruz News has no affiliation to the Oriyon Bank. It should be noted that Joni is also the director of a popular FM station Imruz. The radio station has the full coverage of Tajikistan’s regions.
12 January
Asia Plus weekly, Dushanbe
The Asia Plus weekly (#3, 11 January 2012) published an article describing one evening spend at a TV set watching the local TV channels.
The author criticized the poor quality of broadcasting and the content of TV programs asking the following questions: “Why the Tajik TV professionals cannot produce creative, interactive and modern news about the real people and urgent problems? Why do they produce tendentious, senseless and foolish “stale news” in the old-fashioned style?”
The author comes to the conclusion that the political censorship along with glorification of the authorities, plus amateurism of newsmakers and cameramen lead to such state of things. “There is no original reports, no analysis, no experts’ opinions, no criticism of the government, no voice of the people. Instead, we have dull faces praising the President, farmers and sportsmen”.
18 January
Government media, Dushanbe
The Nigokh weekly (#4, 18 January 2012) published an article criticizing the government mass media for slipping over important events and developments, such as the recent attempt upon the life of the opposition journalist Dodojon Atovulloev and tragic accidents among Tajik labor migrants.
25 January
Farazh weekly, Dushanbe
On 25 January 2012, the private weekly Farazh published a list of organizations, which ignored articles criticizing them in 2011. The newspaper mentions 54 government agencies and institutions, which have breached the Resolution of the President #622 obliging them to provide feedback to the media on criticism and report about measures taken to correct the situation.
27 January
Reporters Without Borders
The international NGO Reporters Without Borders published the Freedom of Press Index Report in 2011-2012, where Tajikistan is rated 122-nd among 179 countries.
Tajikistan is placed between Algeria and Malaysia. In the previous RWB report Tajikistan was rated 115-th.
The recent report says that the Tajik authorities keep using the “scarecrow” of the civil war and radical Islamism to exert pressure on the independent media.
31 January
Human Rights Watch
The international NGO Human Rights Watch indicated in its annual report that the Tajik media experienced essential pressure in 2001.
Government officials kept applying to the court against certain printing media complaining about “defamation and libel” forcing the newspapers to keep silent.
HRW refers to the remarks of Reporters Without Borders saying that “the authorities try to control the media applying various tools, such as unofficial financial pressure, court litigations and frivolous arrests”.
According to the international monitoring NGO Article19, the new Tajik draft media law does not meet the international standards of the freedom of expression.
II. VIOLATION OF RIGHTS IN THE MEDIA
1. Attack on a journalist
12 January
Dodojon Atovulloev, independent journalist
On 12 January 2012, the Tajik journalist Dodojon Atovulloev was delivered to the hospital with serious knife wounds.
Atovulloev was attacked by an unknown assailant near an Italian restaurant. Referring to comments by the clinic’s doctors, the Tajik service of Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty says that the wounds are quite serious, and the journalist has lost a lot of blood. However, Atovulloev’s life is not in danger; the first surgery has been successful.
Atovulloev, 56, is a Tajik journalist and founder of the opposition movement Vatandor (compatriot). He gained popularity criticizing the regime of President Rakhmon. At present, Atovulloev resides in Russia and Germany.
In 2011, the Tajik Prosecutor General initiated criminal proceedings against the journalist and required extradition of Atovulloev, but the Russian authorities did not satisfy the request.
On 13 January, the Tajik Union of Journalists, the National Association of Independent Mass Media and the Media Alliance of Tajikistan disseminated a joint statement condemning the attack upon Atovulloev.
A similar statement was issued by the Tajik Association of Persian-language Journalists. “The assault upon Atovulloev is seen as an infringement of the freedom of speech. The organization expects from both Russian and Tajik law enforcement agencies to conduct thorough investigation of the incident. It also notes that the assault upon a well-known journalist spoils the image of each country.
Muhammad Egamzod, the head of the Tajik media holding Tajinfo says that the attempt upon Atovulloev might have political reasons, since the journalist is an adversary of the Tajik authorities. Egamzod added that the authorities might be interested in arranging the attack against their enemy.
A representative of the Tajik Foreign Ministry told the media that the Tajik law enforcement agencies are interested in a fastest and efficient investigation of the case.
Major General Erkin Muhiddinov, a veteran of the Tajik law enforcement agencies told the Asia Plus weekly that the attempt upon Dodojon Atovulloev in Moscow is an act of hooliganism rather than an action of special services.
On 20 January, the Tajik Interior Minister Ramazan Rakhimov told journalists that his agency is ready to investigate the incident of Atovulloev is their Russian counterparts require assistance.
“Atovulloev’s speculations about the involvement of the Tajik government is nothing but his own opinion. Should he have any evidence, let him apply to our Ministry”, — said Rakhimov.
The Asia Plus weekly (#6, 23 January 2012) published an interview with Dodojon Atovulloev who shared some details of the recent incident in Moscow. The journalist states that the attempt upon his life was organized in such a way that it would look like a simple street conflict. He claims that the attack was ordered from Dushanbe/
2. Ungrounded limitation of access to information
4 January
All media
In January, ministers and heads of other government institutions will conduct press conferences to report to the media about their activities, achievements and failures in 2001.
In March 2005, the Tajik President issued a decree obliging heads of government agencies to conduct press conferences on a quarterly basis with the purpose of ensuring transparency and accountability. However, in September 2011, amendments were introduced to the document, according to which the officials must communicate with the media only once every six months.
According to the President’s Office, ministers and other high-ranking government officials have the right to conduct press conferences as frequently as they wish. In reality, government officials are usually reluctant to communicate with journalists.
Nuriddin Karshibaev, chairman of the Tajik National Association of Independent Mass Media noted that the amendments to the President’s Decree will have a negative impact on access to information.
On 11 January 2012, the correspondent of the Tajik service of Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (Radio Ozodi) Mirzonabi Kholikzoda approache NANSMIT complaining abouth the quality of semi-annual press conferences.
In particular, the journalist noted that the Prosecutor General was absent at the recent press conference, and his deputies failed to answer essential questions.
At a press conference hold on 11 January 2012 in the northern city of Khujand, officials of the State Labor and Migration Service under the government also had troubles answering questions of journalists. Certain officials say that they are new in their positions and are unable to share this or that information; once in a while, they say that the data is “classified”, but they cannot justify their statements; others refer journalists to central offices in the capital.
According to observations of journalists and media watchdogs, heads of government agencies prefer to speak about the topics chosen by themselves; they do not answer topical questions thus demonstrating their professional incompetence.
3. Violation of circulation of a medium
12 January
Asia Plus weekly, Dushanbe
The Asia Plus weekly (#3, 11 January 2012) informs that somebody had bought the whole shipment of the new issue of the newspaper delivered from Dushanbe to the northern city of Khujand.
According to residents of Asht, could not buy the newspaper – allegedly because of an article describing the situation in that district and the conflict between the authorities and the opposition journalist Makhmadyusuf Ismoiov. A while ago, the journalist published a series of articles criticizing the local governors and revealing cases of corruption. Eventually he was sued and required to pay an amount of 50 thousand Somoni as a moral compensation for defamation.
The main characters in the recent article published by Asia Plus were the former governor of Asht province presently heading the district branch of the President’s People Democratic Party, and the former district prosecutor. Observers say that the newspapers were confiscated after the order from the incumbent district prosecutor.